Re: > Subject: Re: Detailed explanation why uber move from postgress to mysql
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 08:55:09 -0500
Message-ID: <481b0f05-1b31-19ff-835b-9703fafdeacf_at_gmail.com>
On 12/25/2016 12:43 AM, Tim Gorman wrote:
> >> Explaining those features is the least I could do for an Oracle ACE.
>
> Actually, the least you could do is explain them correctly.
>
> You started off OK in describing the Oracle in-memory implementation
> as a column store, which is easy enough since it is. And you should
> have stopped there.
>
> Instead, you veered into the weeds with an odd analogy to bitmap
> indexes, which indicates either unfamiliarity with in-memory column
> stores, or with bitmap indexes, or both. There is nothing to suggest
> the method, the manner, the usage, or the impact of bitmap indexes in
> any in-memory column store implementation.
>
Actually, I didn't come up with that analogy. The credit goes to another
Oracle ACE, soon to be retired:
https://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2013/11/06/12c-in-memory/
/
Last but certainly not least, I wish you a merry Christmas.
///With the in-memory columnar copy you should be able to drop many “DSS
indexes”, thus improving OLTP response times – in effect the in-memory
stuff behaves a bit like non-persistent bitmap indexing./
/
I can see that you disagree with such a description, but I cannot claim
the authorship. I am glad you recognized that as a falsehood from a mile
away and I am sure you will be able to correct the author.
-- Mladen Gogala Oracle DBA http://mgogala.freehostia.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sun Dec 25 2016 - 14:55:09 CET