Re: DBVisit as an alternative to Oracle Golden Gate Replication.

From: Michael Cunningham <napacunningham_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 07:52:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPt39tv0tdJqGF-+Xjnrx-xsiM0rXc-UetLJh2h-PGKkQwcG2g_at_mail.gmail.com>

We are also looking at DBVisit Replication. We have not jumped in yet. It will be to do Oracle to PostgreSQL replication. DBVisit told us that replication to PostgreSQL will be out this December. We don't use GG due to cost. It's unfortunate Oracle doesn't license GG for temporary use. It's the perfect product for temporary licensing (such as 30 or 60 days).

Like Ahmed, I also look for some advice on DBVisit.

Michael

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Zabair Ahmed <dmarc-noreply_at_freelists.org> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> Has anybody out there used DBVisit as an alternative to Oracle Golden Gate
> Replication.
>
> We are thinking of replacing Oracle Golden Gate 11gR2 with DBVisit
> Replication due to the high licensing cost with Oracle GG.
>
> I wanted to know if anybody has had any experience with DBVisit
> Replication - good or bad. Any best practices with DBVisit. I was thinking
> of setting up a Proof of Concept for DBVisit Replication, any pointers
> greatly appreciated.
>
> At the moment we are only doing Oracle to Oracle replication, this could
> change in the future eg PostgreSQL.
>
> TIA
>
> Zabair
>

-- 
Michael Cunningham

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon May 16 2016 - 16:52:47 CEST