Re: OT: The new Oramag digital format
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:29:07 -0600
Message-ID: <57360EE3.2040004_at_gmail.com>
On 13/05/2016 7:52 AM, Rich J wrote:
>
> Anyone else frustrated with the Oracle Magazine digital format?
> Trying to read it again this month and it makes me angry. My
> technical periodicals should not make me angry.
>
> I sent feedback (and did receive a response) back in January, but this
> format is just not readable.
>
> I'm sure there are business reasons for retiring the PDF, but this
> customer isn't happy.
>
> </vent>
>
> Rich
>
When I resize the content (using "Command -" on Mac) to make the front page fit my available browser area, the magazine seems acceptable.
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:29:07 -0600
Message-ID: <57360EE3.2040004_at_gmail.com>
On 13/05/2016 7:52 AM, Rich J wrote:
>
> Anyone else frustrated with the Oracle Magazine digital format?
> Trying to read it again this month and it makes me angry. My
> technical periodicals should not make me angry.
>
> I sent feedback (and did receive a response) back in January, but this
> format is just not readable.
>
> I'm sure there are business reasons for retiring the PDF, but this
> customer isn't happy.
>
> </vent>
>
> Rich
>
When I resize the content (using "Command -" on Mac) to make the front page fit my available browser area, the magazine seems acceptable.
/Hans
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri May 13 2016 - 19:29:07 CEST