Re: Pure Storage opinions

From: Ls Cheng <exriscer_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:46:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJ2-Qb-_LuorzY6ps6yCKeyc7DKdZ+QKwt5Q2n=b2-t3Wa2yKg_at_mail.gmail.com>



I have a customer who uses HDS VSP G1000, All-Flash and the latency is great, average 0.2ms for log parallel writes and 0.3ms for log file sync, 0.6ms for db sequential/scattered read. The databases is a 4 nodes RAC, 14000 IOPS where average 9000 is redo log writes.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Thump CC <thump_at_cosmiccooler.org> wrote:

> Along with the new kid on the block(D5) it’s also worth looking at
> ExtremIO and 3PAR
>
> > On Apr 20, 2016, at 3:30 PM, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/20/2016 03:27 PM, Jeff Chirco wrote:
> >> Anyone use or used Pure Storage for your database storage? We
> currently have NetApp and it is coming on a hardware refresh so we are
> looking around. We've looked at the ZFS which seems really nice, a little
> more expensive than we though but great for Oracle database. Now my system
> admins are looking at Pure Storage as a possibility as well. From what I
> read it seems like a all flash system and apparently hardware freshes are
> built into the support contract. Let me know if you have any onions.
> >> Currently we are running Oracle on Windows Server 2008r2 with 11.2.0.4
> but moving all over to Oracle Linux and eventually 12c.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jeff
> >
> > Hi Jeff!
> > I don't have any onions, but I can offer some scallions. As a consultant
> working for a backup vendor, I have encountered Pure several times and all
> the customers that I know of are very happy. Pure is very fast and very
> reliable. Administration interface is fairly intuitive and it supports
> everything that other storage support.
> > Regards
> >
> > --
> > Mladen Gogala
> > Oracle DBA
> > http://mgogala.freehostia.com
> >
> > --
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Apr 21 2016 - 09:46:07 CEST

Original text of this message