RE: disabled cores

From: Neil Chandler <neil_chandler_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:50:16 +0100
Message-ID: <DUB404-EAS35706BD991C05DBDECAC40685980_at_phx.gbl>

What Niall says - that's a non contractual doc, although they like people to think otherwise .

Oracles general line about disabling cores is that there is no audit trail so its not legit.

If you want to go that route, or vmware, talk to your lawyers and LMS first.

Otherwise, physical tin or use OVM and hard partitioning and suck up the Oracle line...

Regards

Neil

Sent from my Windows Phone

---

From: Niall Litchfield<mailto:niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com> Sent: ‎30/‎03/‎2016 14:08
To: chetal_at_gmail.com<mailto:chetal_at_gmail.com> Cc: Patrice Boivin<mailto:patrice.boivin_at_gmail.com>; ORACLE-L<mailto:oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Subject: Re: disabled cores

Note, however, that that document is not contractual. The bottom line here is that you will need to consult your contract(s), your lawyers and your Oracle account representatives (or resellers).

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Pradeep Chetal <chetal_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>
> It depends on what virtualization and hardware as well. Please go thru
>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/pricing/partitioning-070609.pdf
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Patrice sur GMail <
> patrice.boivin_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am wondering whether you've had to disable core to keep licensing costs
>> down, or if that is even considered legit.
>>
>>
>> -- Patrice
>> My profiles: [image: Facebook]
>> <http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/profile.php?id=100000206805521>[image:
>> LinkedIn] <http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/patrice-boivin/a/933/5a9>[image:
>> Twitter] <http://www.twitter.com/PatriceBoivin>
>>
>
>

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Mar 30 2016 - 16:50:16 CEST