Re: Security Wonks ate my hamster.

From: John Piwowar <jpiwowar_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 06:57:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJgcjABdF0xDJ8XiPiY8tMQurf7xMjnY+hFB_rO+=-gikAXihw_at_mail.gmail.com>

Yup, that's a fair point, both about the analogy and the situation, thanks!

It really comes down to whether the process is more thoroughly defined than, "passwords locked in that box over there." :-) I'm hoping the answer is yes.

On Wednesday, 23 March 2016, <rajendra.pande_at_ubs.com> wrote:

> Well it depends is right J
>
>
>
> “but I really wonder about about the motivation of taking the keys away
> from the guy entrusted to drive the bus.”
>
> With a lot of ongoing issues – staying with your analogy - the effort is *NOT
> *to take the keys of the bus – but make it such that the driver gets to
> have the keys when he needs to drive the bus and not have the keys all the
> time.
>
> Standing access vs break glass when you need it
>
>
>
> The question comes down to is how easy or cumbersome that process is
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,

John P.

(Typed with thumbs on a mobile device. Lowered expectations appreciated)

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Mar 23 2016 - 14:57:54 CET