Re: Non-RAC Failover Design

From: Nagaraj S <nagaraj.chk_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 23:39:25 +0530
Message-ID: <CAG6s0C1MPT+Gdw8PBpX=q-JeSDS-i3hrK-DVa3GyhJHx79YwxQ_at_mail.gmail.com>

Thank You John Thomas, Do you have link or ppt of Niall Litchfield presentation

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:29 PM, John Thomas <jt2354_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Niall Litchfield did a very good presentation at last year's UKOUG on
> using Grid/Clusterware for failover to a cold instance operating under the
> ten day rule.
>
> Regards
>
> JT
>
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2016, 17:53 Nagaraj S <nagaraj.chk_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Good Morning Gurus,
>>
>> I need help on RAC Vs Non-RAC Failover Design . One of our application
>> need to move out of RAC due to cost factor in this case which HA will be
>> better? I am thinking of OS Failover with Active Passive mechanism. Also
>> help me on Application perspective what are the things I need to check
>> before moving it to NON RAC?
>>
>> -nagaraj
>>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Sat Jan 30 2016 - 19:09:25 CET