Re: diff between incremental and archive backups
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:30:22 -0500
Message-ID: <5647FC4E.4020103_at_gmail.com>
On 11/14/2015 08:08 PM, Andrew Kerber wrote:
> Well, say rather incrementals aren't used so much for DR anymore.
> Standbys are more common for that, but if you do reach the point
> where your primary and all standbys are gone, I, as a DBA, would want
> a technology that I am highly experienced with, and understand well
> when I am working on a company's last resort.
>
> But really, the most commonly reason for rman full and incremental
> backups is recovery from logical corruption caused by human error.
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:30:22 -0500
Message-ID: <5647FC4E.4020103_at_gmail.com>
On 11/14/2015 08:08 PM, Andrew Kerber wrote:
> Well, say rather incrementals aren't used so much for DR anymore.
> Standbys are more common for that, but if you do reach the point
> where your primary and all standbys are gone, I, as a DBA, would want
> a technology that I am highly experienced with, and understand well
> when I am working on a company's last resort.
>
> But really, the most commonly reason for rman full and incremental
> backups is recovery from logical corruption caused by human error.
Hmmm, I do prefer flashback over restore. It is much faster.
-- Mladen Gogala Oracle DBA http://mgogala.freehostia.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sun Nov 15 2015 - 04:30:22 CET