Re: oracle patches
From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:56:40 +0000
Message-ID: <CABe10sZQzOt_63HgivjjRuA8dST6wxGMkjX7sf24yRHAnSrYpw_at_mail.gmail.com>
In a word no. Can you share a log of the session? On 10 Nov 2015 10:58, "Howard Latham" <howard.latham_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:56:40 +0000
Message-ID: <CABe10sZQzOt_63HgivjjRuA8dST6wxGMkjX7sf24yRHAnSrYpw_at_mail.gmail.com>
In a word no. Can you share a log of the session? On 10 Nov 2015 10:58, "Howard Latham" <howard.latham_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> redhat linux 5
> 11.2.04
> patch id 21352635
>
>
> We finally relented and gone for the quarterly patches from oracle
> driven by security wonks rather than technical need . - is it unusual
> - as with this patch that nothing has to be done? Ie opatch runs but
> makes no changes.
>
> --
> Howard A. Latham
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Nov 10 2015 - 13:56:40 CET