RE: Snapshot Thin Clone of Physical Standby

From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:56:36 -0400
Message-ID: <0a3901d0ffb8$b4f1b870$1ed52950$_at_rsiz.com>



Late to the thread. Is the exact startup rename command you’re using appear in the thread somewhere?

When using less than crash recovery (ie. complete recovery) suitable files, does your command include the phrase “using backup controlfile?”  

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Don Seiler Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 5:20 PM
To: Jeremy Schneider
Cc: ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Snapshot Thin Clone of Physical Standby  

So in the case of the source DB being a primary (or standalone) DB, we can just mount the cloned controlfile, rename the datafiles/logs (if needed) and then open it and let it do crash recovery.  

If the source DB is a physical standby, we can create a new controlfile and open resetlogs.  

Either way we then do a DBNEWID so we'd be doing a resetlogs anyway. I'm curious why the CREATE CONTROLFILE option has problems when the source is a primary, but at least for now we have something that works.  

Thanks again everyone.  

Don.  

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us> wrote:

Ironically now, when I take the method we have for creating a new controlfile and apply it to cloning from a primary database, it tells me that datafile 1 needs more recovery when I try to open resetlogs. I even tried putting the primary into backup mode first just to see if that was it, but I got the same error. All the online redo logs were in the same snapshot as the datafiles (same protection group), but it doesn't seem to want to use them. No errors/complaints from the CREATE CONTROLFILE statement.  

The one thing that I'm curious about is that we ARE changing the DB name in the CREATE CONTROLFILE statement. Would that impact our ability to use the online redo logs that were snapshotted?  

Don.  

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Jeremy Schneider <jeremy.schneider_at_ardentperf.com> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us> wrote:
> Jeremy, I'm curious why a backup primary controlfile would work when
> recreating a controlfile would not. We've tried the latter and that's when
> it said we had incomplete media recovery. Why would the backup primary
> controlfile not also have the same issue?

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us> wrote:
> Seth, that did appear to work now when I create a new controlfile. I'll see
> how best to script that part of it.

Glad to hear it started working! I couldn't think if any reason that a create controlfile shouldn't work. Just was pointing out that the primary controlfile backup works routinely for me to avoid the issue with standby controlfile backups.

-J

--
http://about.me/jeremy_schneider





>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us> wrote:
>>
>> To answer your question, no we didn't try the copy-controlfile-from-prod
>> method. I'll look into that.
>>
>> Don.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> In 11.2 I used to be able to mount the clone, and if the controlfile was
>>> a standby I would just backup the controlfile and restore it from that
>>> backup and (voila) it would now be a primary. That doesn't seem to be the
>>> case in 12.1 now. Not sure if that alone is at the root of the problem.
>>>
>>> I was hoping to avoid having to connect to any source databases for this,
>>> but maybe there's no away around it. It would have been cleaner to just be
>>> able to snapshot from the storage array and do all the work from the cloned
>>> instance.
>>>
>>> Don.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Jeremy Schneider
>>> <jeremy.schneider_at_ardentperf.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > ORA-01511: error in renaming log/data files
>>>> > ORA-00261: log 52 of thread 1 is being archived or modified
>>>>
>>>> well it's nice to hear that this problem still exists in 12c - i'm
>>>> very aware of it in 11.2.0.3
>>>>
>>>> it's because the software isn't really able to handle the standby log
>>>> which is currently active. i have run into the exact same issue doing
>>>> a "recover datafile" on a clone which was created using a backup
>>>> controlfile from the standby. in my case, i simply used the backup
>>>> from the primary (and changed nothing else) and i don't have the
>>>> issue.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > So we go to plan B, which is to try to create a new controlfile. The
>>>> > new
>>>> > CREATE CONTROLFILE script doesn't specify the standby redo logs.
>>>> >
>>>> > ERROR at line 1:
>>>> > ORA-01196: file 1 is inconsistent due to a failed media recovery
>>>> > session
>>>> > ORA-01110: data file 1: '/file/name/here.dbf'
>>>> >
>>>> > Every variation of this that we've tried fails similarly.
>>>>
>>>> So you did also try taking a backup of the primary controlfile and
>>>> restoring this into the standby, then renaming all your logfiles and
>>>> datafiles to match the new locations? That has worked for me on 11203
>>>> for avoiding the error you mentioned above.
>>>>
>>>> -J
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://about.me/jeremy_schneider
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Don Seiler
>>> http://www.seiler.us
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Don Seiler
>> http://www.seiler.us
>
>
>
>
> --
> Don Seiler
> http://www.seiler.us
-- Don Seiler http://www.seiler.us -- Don Seiler http://www.seiler.us -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Oct 05 2015 - 23:56:36 CEST

Original text of this message