RE: Bigger block sizes

From: Sheehan, Jeremy <JEREMY.SHEEHAN_at_nexteraenergy.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:17:08 +0000
Message-ID: <939730CDCC52DA43AB03D00E4C678B9C2EDECA50_at_goxsa3144.fplu.fpl.com>



Orlando,

I did testing and implemented a BLOB tablespace with 32K blocksize and I saw about a 20% increase in performance when saving and retrieving files into a blob column.

Jeremy

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Koehler Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:03 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org; oralrnr_at_gmail.com Subject: Re: Bigger block sizes

This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email.


Hi Orlando,
it depends (as always).

Franck Pachot has written a great blog post with several demos about this topic: http://blog.dbi-services.com/do-the-block-size-matter/

Best Regards
Stefan Koehler

Freelance Oracle performance consultant and researcher Homepage: http://www.soocs.de
Twitter: _at_OracleSK

> Orlando L <oralrnr_at_gmail.com> hat am 30. September 2015 um 23:29 geschrieben:
>
> List,
>
> Does anyone in the list use non default blocksize of greater than 8K for your oracle DBs; if so, is it for warehousing/OLAP type applications?
> What advantages do you get with them; any disadvantage.
>
> Orlando.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

†Ûiÿü0ÁúÞzX¬¶Ê+ƒün– {ú+iÉ^ Received on Thu Oct 01 2015 - 18:17:08 CEST

Original text of this message