AW: Re: Large index creation speed up / issues with direct path read temp / direct path write temp
From: l.flatz <l.flatz_at_bluewin.ch>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 11:45:09 +0200
Message-ID: <u148nypclx4ov1v1xwaf87j3.1436089509749_at_email.android.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 11:45:09 +0200
Message-ID: <u148nypclx4ov1v1xwaf87j3.1436089509749_at_email.android.com>
Oh, I see. Thanks for letting me know. I am a performance specialist. Therefore I am not aware how to deal with this situation. Maybe our colleagues will give you some advice. I would simply create the index on both sides which is probably pretty naive. ☺
Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet.
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: GG <grzegorzof_at_interia.pl> Datum: 05.07.2015 11:07 (GMT+01:00) An: l.flatz_at_bluewin.ch, oracle-l_at_freelists.org Betreff: Re: Large index creation speed up / issues with direct path read temp / direct path write temp
W dniu 2015-07-05 o 08:54, Lothar Flatz pisze:
Hi, "Increassing parallelism is the option but we will not survive arch log stream with parallel 8 . (long story short)" it almost feels silly asking: Are you not using "create index .... nologging"? Am I missing something here?
Standby involved (production HA) no way :( .
G
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sun Jul 05 2015 - 11:45:09 CEST