Re: Partitionining perfortmance degraded drastically after upgrading the database from Oracle 102.0.4 to Oracle

From: Bobby Curtis <>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 09:04:18 -0500
Message-Id: <>

Have you checked you execution plans to see what has changed with these queries? There were some changes with the optimizer from 10g to 11g.

Bobby Curtis, MBA

> On Jan 9, 2015, at 08:58, Mandal, Ashoke <> wrote:
> Greetings All,
> I have upgraded one of my 2TB databases with partitioned tables & indexes from Oracle to Oracle recently and experiencing severe poor query performance. The response time of the queries have increased by 20-25 times.
> Before the upgrade to 11g
> After the upgrade to 11g
> My understanding is that if I set SGA_TARGET and PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET parameters to 0 then Oracle manages theses as per the MEMORY_TARGET parameter in 11g.
> Q. Is it true that the SGA can't grow more than 1GB since SGA_MAX_SIZE is still set to 1GB?
> Q2. Will the performance improve by setting SGA_TARGET to 4GB by default?
> Q3. Should I also set the PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET to GB as it was prior the upgrade?
> Q4. Any known issue of partitioning performance impact after you upgrade a 10g database to 11g?
> Please let me know if you any suggestions to resolve this issue
> Appreciate your help in advance,
> Ashoke
> Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your records.
> To view this notice in other languages you can either select the following link or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of a web browser:
> --

Received on Fri Jan 09 2015 - 15:04:18 CET

Original text of this message