Fwd: Developer 9i --> rdbms 11g or later

• Forwarded message ---------- From: Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco <jcdrpllist_at_gmail.com> Date: 2014-10-23 11:25 GMT-04:00 Subject: Re: Developer 9i --> rdbms 11g or later To: Patrice sur GMail <patrice.boivin_at_gmail.com>

We connected 6i to database 9i, 10g 10gr2 11g 11gr2 and 12c(currently testing but other people says there is no problem). Tehre were a problem in reports and someone made the tricke replacind a ddl. graphics don't work.

Maybe someone did the trick search outhere. :)

2014-10-23 10:19 GMT-04:00 Patrice sur GMail <patrice.boivin_at_gmail.com>:

6i can connect to newer versions but 9i can't, interestingly enough
>
> thanks Juan
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco <
> jcdrpllist_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We have our application on 6i patch 18, and we are migrating to 12c with
>> no problems, so I think you shouldn't have any problem. But of course I
>> don't work with developer 9i.
>> We have some problems with some specific forms, we could fix, in example,
>> a table with several lobs we have to separate in several block, but out of
>> that the software is unchanged.
>>
>> 2014-10-22 9:32 GMT-04:00 Patrice sur GMail <patrice.boivin_at_gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I know 9i isn't supported etc. etc.
>>>
>>> We have an old application here which can't be upgraded quickly but it
>>> would be nice if it could connect to 11g or later. Among other things if
>>> Developer 9i could connect to current versions it would let our developers
>>> look for potential problems introduced by going to 11g or later on the
>>> database side.
>>>
>>> Developer 9i apparently uses an early version of the 9i client which
>>> uses a connection trigger the newer databases don't like. Developer 9i was
>>> never updated to fix this issue apparently, probably the expectation was
>>> that people would move on to DS 10g.
>>>
>>> (Reminds me of the old days when iAS 1.0.2 had two homes crammed
>>> together, one 6i, one 8i)
>>>
>>> Has anyone managed to either:
>>> a) replace the Developer 9i client with the 9.2 client
>>> or
>>> b) force 11g or later to accept connections from Developer 9i or the
>>> Oracle 9.1 client.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Patrice
>>> My profiles: [image: Facebook]
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/profile.php?id=100000206805521>[image:
>>> LinkedIn] <http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/patrice-boivin/a/933/5a9>[image:
>>> Twitter] <http://www.twitter.com/PatriceBoivin>
>>> <http://www.twitter.com/PatriceBoivin>
>>> Signature powered by WiseStamp <http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> -- Patrice
> My profiles: [image: Facebook]
> <http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/profile.php?id=100000206805521>[image:
> LinkedIn] <http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/patrice-boivin/a/933/5a9>[image:
> Twitter] <http://www.twitter.com/PatriceBoivin>
> <http://www.twitter.com/PatriceBoivin>
> Signature powered by WiseStamp <http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l