Re: Some body know the impact in performance of unused database options installed

From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:46:46 -0600
Message-ID: <54467FE6.2080801_at_gmail.com>



You are correct.

SAP tends to use the database as a dumb data bucket. Not really much 'RDBMSing' going in.

/Hans

On 21/10/2014 9:40 AM, Iggy Fernandez wrote:
> I believe that the SAP data dictionary is an application-specific data
> dictionary. However, the Oracle data dictionary still exists.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:55:56 -0400
> Subject: Re: Some body know the impact in performance of unused
> database options installed
> From: jcdrpllist_at_gmail.com
> To: iggy_fernandez_at_hotmail.com
> CC: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>
> If I remember SAP did that, created all by themselves.
>
> 2014-10-20 15:40 GMT-04:00 Iggy Fernandez <iggy_fernandez_at_hotmail.com
> <mailto:iggy_fernandez_at_hotmail.com>>:
>
> At the risk of being booed, I cannot help thinking that the
> database with the least overhead as well as the most secure is one
> that has no data dictionary or options whatsoever; that is, one
> created with CREATE DATABASE and nothing else. Yes, you will be
> able to create users, tables, indexes, etc but you will have no
> data dictionary whatsoever. No DBA_TABLES. No overhead and no
> "attack vectors" either. Am I completely crazy? Stark raving mad?
>
> Iggy
>
> P.S. With just a little extra, you will be able to create PL/SQL
> functions, procedures, and triggers.
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Oct 21 2014 - 17:46:46 CEST

Original text of this message