Re: higher version Standby database?
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:33:04 -0600
Message-ID: <53AC8380.3040806_at_gmail.com>
On 26/06/2014 2:20 PM, Uzzell, Stephan wrote:
>
> One note I would add to the below (because we wanted to use this
> approach ourselves) is that there are certain restrictions on logical
> standby – there are restrictions on datatypes.
>
> If your application uses BFILEs, Collections, multimedia, any
> user-defined types, you can’t do logical standby…
>
>
Good point.
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:33:04 -0600
Message-ID: <53AC8380.3040806_at_gmail.com>
On 26/06/2014 2:20 PM, Uzzell, Stephan wrote:
>
> One note I would add to the below (because we wanted to use this
> approach ourselves) is that there are certain restrictions on logical
> standby – there are restrictions on datatypes.
>
> If your application uses BFILEs, Collections, multimedia, any
> user-defined types, you can’t do logical standby…
>
>
Good point.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jun 26 2014 - 22:33:04 CEST