Re: DB12c in Production?
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:25:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAE-dsOKdY=5S1G6aWvZrbZkJh6x29OvyOuZjOmXLOqoQ_qBHpQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
Slightly off topic, but related question... In 11g Oracle started recommended that we have a separate Grid and Oracle Home. In 11g, I didn't see a good reason to do this. Seemed like extra cluster. Oracle often makes changes like this as part of a phased in change in later releases.
I am wondering if people see more use for the grid home in 12c? Might work better with the pluggable DB option.
I admitted have not spent a lot of time looking at 12c. I don't expect to use it at all for atleast 1-2 years minimum.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/06/2014 6:49 AM, Mark W. Farnham wrote:
>
> A single PDB in a multi-tenant architecture does not invoke the
> multi-tenant upcharge in any license documentation I have seen. IF it did,
> I think all of Niall’s concerns would be valid.
>
> I concur. (With this as well as the rest of your post. Except about Ed
> ... no personal experience so I can not comment. ;-) )
>
> They should rewrite it to say "Multi-tenant Architecture is part of Oracle
> Database 12c. The option is for Multiple Pluggable User Databases (more
> than one) in one Container."
>
> (I keep insisting on the term User Databases or User PDB, because the
> architecture requires a Root and a Seed PDB that you can not touch.)
>
> /Hans
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Jun 16 2014 - 17:25:39 CEST