Re: DB12c in Production?
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:15:40 -0600
Message-ID: <537A909C.7090306_at_gmail.com>
On 19/05/2014 4:17 PM, Jeff Smith wrote: >>> Then there are the myriad of folk who connect using _at_{SID} instead of @{Service}
> Yup, I'm already seeing this a lot. It's the first thing I ask a user to check when they have a login issue with 12c.
Something to highlight back to Java developers, especially 3-tier guys using the Oracle JDBC drivers or JDBC/JDNI Connection Pools.
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:15:40 -0600
Message-ID: <537A909C.7090306_at_gmail.com>
On 19/05/2014 4:17 PM, Jeff Smith wrote: >>> Then there are the myriad of folk who connect using _at_{SID} instead of @{Service}
> Yup, I'm already seeing this a lot. It's the first thing I ask a user to check when they have a login issue with 12c.
Something to highlight back to Java developers, especially 3-tier guys using the Oracle JDBC drivers or JDBC/JDNI Connection Pools.
For years (and years and years) all the demos showed "jdbc:oracle:thin:_at_host:port:sid" and that "black magic" has been propagated throughout our industry.
(This describes the variants, including IPv6 http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/java.112/e16548/urls.htm#JJDBC08200)
(BTW,
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/java.112/e16548/overvw.htm#JJDBC28044 is
a great feature list that might encourage Java developers to read the
doc...)
/Hans
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue May 20 2014 - 01:15:40 CEST