RE: DB12c in Production? (single PDB thread)

From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 10:04:26 -0400
Message-ID: <24fd01cf736b$3f726430$be572c90$_at_rsiz.com>



In addition to what Hans mentioned, you can apparently install a full new stack of an upgraded and/or patched container database and test the upgrade by unplugging from the older release and plugging into the new release. Careful thought about your actual recovery and flashback query possibility changes across such a plug and unplug operation should be considered quite seriously.

But even with only being allowed one pluggable at a time without extra license cost, this does seem to facilitate the idea of instituting a fully patched up stack on a test machine and then serially testing databases from various other machines one at a time (which may well fit with the upgrade calendar if the applications hosted in the various putative separate machines and database remain unconsolidated for a good reason.)

Of course in the mode of a single PDB at a time, you do lose one of the major advantages of the CDB, which is the reduced process count on the machine of all the Oracle background jobs with one container hosting many sort of independent databases.

Fasten your seatbelts.

mwf

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Hans Forbrich
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:24 AM
To: Iggy Fernandez
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: DB12c in Production?

On 18/05/2014 6:18 PM, Iggy Fernandez wrote:
>
> What are the advantages of using a CDB with a single pluggable
> database (as appears to be allowed without extra cost when using
> Enterprise Edition) instead of a non-CDB?
>
> Iggy

Biggest advantage is getting used to the new architecture - the older architecture is officially known as "pre-12c" and based on that terminology we suspect it will phase out.

My experience is that we need to plan at least 6 months getting adjusted to the CDB concept and fixing scripts, etc. Switch is not going to be a cake-walk, so the sooner we start looking at it seriously ...

Other than that, it gives a whole new way of thinking about and handling backups, migrations, duplications, PITR, etc. - think 'transportable database' to get started.

I suspect we have not begun to see the tip of this iceberg.

/Hans

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon May 19 2014 - 16:04:26 CEST

Original text of this message