Re: Quick and Dirty Grid Control
From: Fuad Arshad <fuadar_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 08:56:39 -0700
Message-Id: <74903203-C538-4276-B712-AD476DD600D2_at_yahoo.com>
aah missed the part if them being on one server
>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Fuad Arshad <dmarc-noreply_at_freelists.org> wrote:
>> 600 databases are not that many from a grid control or cloud control perspective . I'm wondering why the comment was made . if you have ovm running you can down the EM templates and run a discovery . I have had over 1200 databases being monitored usif em11g grid control where the oms and repo was running on a tiny SPARC v880 with not many issues
>>
>> Fuad
>>
>>
>> > On May 2, 2014, at 8:28, "Freeman, Donald G. CTR (ABL)" <donald.freeman.ctr_at_ablcda.navy.mil> wrote:
>> >
>> > The place I work doesn't use grid control. They have about 600 active
>> > databases in the development regions. We lack hardware infrastructure.
>> > All of these databases are mounted on five Solaris 10 Servers. Another DBA
>> > told me that they previously tried to get Grid Control running but it failed
>> > on discovery. It couldn't handle that many objects on a server. That was
>> > some time ago.
>> >
>> > I'm about to get drafted (listening over the wall) to patch this weekend
>> > (I'm not on that team) and I'm not really interested in trying to patch that
>> > many databases manually, at least not twice. Is there a method to install
>> > grid control in some way that it can handle this situation? Can 12C handle
>> > this?
>> >
>> > I would start doing some reading but I'm afraid somebody is going to walk
>> > around the corner in about 5 minutes and give me, "the look." I'm looking
>> > for a direction to march in that will fix this going forward.
>> >
>> >
>> --
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 08:56:39 -0700
Message-Id: <74903203-C538-4276-B712-AD476DD600D2_at_yahoo.com>
aah missed the part if them being on one server
Fuad
> On May 2, 2014, at 8:51, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > 100+ databases on a single server might well be challenging on the *agent* side, How many software homes, listeners etc are there? > > > >
>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Fuad Arshad <dmarc-noreply_at_freelists.org> wrote:
>> 600 databases are not that many from a grid control or cloud control perspective . I'm wondering why the comment was made . if you have ovm running you can down the EM templates and run a discovery . I have had over 1200 databases being monitored usif em11g grid control where the oms and repo was running on a tiny SPARC v880 with not many issues
>>
>> Fuad
>>
>>
>> > On May 2, 2014, at 8:28, "Freeman, Donald G. CTR (ABL)" <donald.freeman.ctr_at_ablcda.navy.mil> wrote:
>> >
>> > The place I work doesn't use grid control. They have about 600 active
>> > databases in the development regions. We lack hardware infrastructure.
>> > All of these databases are mounted on five Solaris 10 Servers. Another DBA
>> > told me that they previously tried to get Grid Control running but it failed
>> > on discovery. It couldn't handle that many objects on a server. That was
>> > some time ago.
>> >
>> > I'm about to get drafted (listening over the wall) to patch this weekend
>> > (I'm not on that team) and I'm not really interested in trying to patch that
>> > many databases manually, at least not twice. Is there a method to install
>> > grid control in some way that it can handle this situation? Can 12C handle
>> > this?
>> >
>> > I would start doing some reading but I'm afraid somebody is going to walk
>> > around the corner in about 5 minutes and give me, "the look." I'm looking
>> > for a direction to march in that will fix this going forward.
>> >
>> >
>> --
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> > > > -- > Niall Litchfield > Oracle DBA > http://www.orawin.info
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri May 02 2014 - 17:56:39 CEST