Re: Dataguard Exadata -> Database Appliance
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:16:36 -0300
Message-ID: <CAHzYOgFcAtsBo2g6_6=pvRE5RF78zmYDqRRp62sTbGNv1iLmFg_at_mail.gmail.com>
Here we have two Exadata machines, both with dataguard on regular hardware (not ODA).
The only limitation (apart from Exadata performance improvements) is that we can not enable HCC.
It is posible to use HCC if you have attached an aditional Sun ZFS storage.
On 15 April 2014 12:24, Stephens, Chris <Chris.Stephens_at_adm.com> wrote:
> Good one though I don’t think that will be an issue for a while either.
>
>
>
> HCC support would be another issue I think.
>
>
>
> *From:* Hemant K Chitale [mailto:hemantkchitale_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 15, 2014 10:15 AM
> *To:* Stephens, Chris
> *Cc:* oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> *Subject:* Re: Dataguard Exadata -> Database Appliance
>
>
>
> Storage capacity difference ?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Stephens, Chris <Chris.Stephens_at_adm.com>
> wrote:
>
> I was just asked by management whether it would be possible to run
> Dataguard from Exadata (Primary) to a Database Appliance (Standby). I
> can’t think of a reason why that wouldn’t be *possible*.
>
>
>
> I’m not sure that’s the question they are actually asking though which
> is: Would it be justifiable for us to save some money and run our standby
> on cheaper hardware (and consequently software licensing)?
>
>
>
> I don’t think processing power differences will be a problem for quite
> some time. The biggest drawback I can think of is that all of a sudden you
> have to keep OS/GI (running RAC)/RDBMS versions and patching at the same
> level.
>
>
>
> What else am I not thinking of? …how bad of an idea is it?
>
>
>
> I would have even really considered it as a possibility but then I don’t
> pay the bills or have to justify them either.
>
>
>
> Thanks for any help with this.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
> it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email reply.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Hemant K Chitale
> http://hemantoracledba.blogspot.com
> http://hemantscribbles.blogspot.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
> it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email reply.
>
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Apr 15 2014 - 19:16:36 CEST