Re: After 11.2.0.4 upgradge getting ORA-12012, ORA-04021, ORA-06512 errors on ETL job
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:17:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJzM94CQVZUNN4_KmTa4-A2Rr3=grbP6g10WFSFLebcS7CgBwA_at_mail.gmail.com>
As I recall, it was waiting on a library cache lock. I'll have them run it again and verify.
Sandy
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Mark Bobak <Mark.Bobak_at_proquest.com> wrote:
>  ORA-04021 is timeout occurred while waiting to lock object.  Before that
> occurs, the session in question will be waiting.  Is it waiting on 'library
> cache lock'?  'library cache pin'?  Some type of mutex wait?  Something
> else?
>
>  -Mark
>
>   From: Sandra Becker <sbecker6925_at_gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "sbecker6925_at_gmail.com" <sbecker6925_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, March 7, 2014 at 10:30 AM
> To: oracle-l <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
>
> Subject: After 11.2.0.4 upgradge getting ORA-12012, ORA-04021, ORA-06512
> errors on ETL job
>
>    OS - Solaris Sparc 10
>  Oracle - EE 11.2.0.4
>
>  We upgraded a dev database from 11.2.0.2 to 11.2.0.4.  One of our ETL
> jobs started failing with errors ORA-12012, ORA-04021, ORA-06512.  We have
> identified the object it is waiting to lock, but have no idea why this is
> occurring.  The object is a partitioned table.  The code did not change.  I
> was told it creates a new table and does a partition exchange.  I am not
> familiar with partition exchanges, but wonder if this might be where the
> issue lies. It also does some of it's work over a dblink to another
> database.
>
>  I've opened a ticket with oracle, but I've been give only until noon
> Monday to resolve or I have to downgrade the database.  Can anyone point me
> in the right direction.  My searches so far have told me only how to find
> the object in question.
>
>  Thank you.
>
> --
> Sandy
> GHX, Inc.
>
-- Sandy Transzap, Inc. -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Mar 07 2014 - 18:17:50 CET
