Re: datapump export incredibly slow

From: Sameer Choudhari <sameer.choudhari_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:21:41 +1100
Message-ID: <CAL4wsdBawKEGgJT2QhEZbANiF_m07w67sRHE4O+WmGZBEwF6jQ_at_mail.gmail.com>



Hi

*Quick question:* is there any way we can speed up the IMPDP process by disabling the REDO log generation in Oracle 11g? I could see this feature is available in 12C. With *transform=disable_archive_logging *to disable all redo logging for Oracle 12c imports. Also, read about hidden parameter *_disable_logging
= true* to reduce redo. But as per Tom's suggestion, never use this parameter as it corrupt the DB.

Cheers,
Sameer <http://www.choudhari.net>

On 16 February 2014 16:12, Gus Spier <gus.spier_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Chris, is there anything significant about the object?
>
> *** 2014-02-14 14:51:25.924
>
> WAIT #139990593434552: nam='wait for unread message on broadcast channel'
> ela= 1000810 channel context=93982405280 channel handle=94519841120 p3=0
> *obj#=803670* tim=1392411085924778
>
>
> My limited understanding is that ela refers to the elapsed time and the tim
> value represents the wall clock.
>
>
> *** 2014-02-14 14:51:26.925
>
> WAIT #139990593434552: nam='wait for unread message on broadcast channel'
> ela= 1000867 channel context=93982405280 channel handle=94519841120 p3=0
> obj#=803670 tim=1392411086925789
>
> EXEC #139990593434552:c=2999,e=5009559,p=0,cr=4,cu=0,mis=0,r=
> 0,dep=3,og=4,plh=0,tim=1392411086926186
>
> ERROR #139990593434552:err=25228 tim=1392411086926229
> CLOSE #139990593434552:c=0,e=4,dep=
>
> 3,type=3,tim=1392411086926370
>
> The next wait message cites the same WAIT # and name (wait for unread ...)
> The ela value is a mere 57 "oh-no seconds" since the last message but the
> wall clock (time) differs by 1001408 (unless there is a transcription
> error). The ERROR line assigns the same value as the WAIT#, EXEC#, and ERROR
> #. The error itself appears to be an ORA-25228. No surprise here -
> ORA-25228: timeout or end-of-fetch during message dequeue from string.
> string
> Cause: User-specified dequeue wait time has passed or the end of the
> queue has been reached but no message has been retrieved.
> Action: Try dequeue again with the appropriate WAIT_TIME or the
> FIRST_MESSAGE option.
>
> I wish I could be more help, but this might lead you to more lines of
> investigation.
>
> Let us know how it works out.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gus
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Stephens, Chris <Chris.Stephens_at_adm.com>wrote:
>
>> 11.2.0.4 RAC on Oracle Linux 6.
>>
>>
>>
>> Right now I'm battling an unbelievably slow export but imports seem
>> unreasonably slow as well. This occurs in two different RAC environments.
>> I have a ticket open with Oracle but that's not getting me anywhere quite.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm exporting with the following parameters:
>>
>>
>>
>> SCHEMAS=xxxxxxx
>>
>> CONTENT=ALL
>>
>> DUMPFILE=xxxxxxx_full.dmp
>>
>> LOGFILE=xxxxxxxx_full.exp.log
>>
>> CLUSTER=N
>>
>> PARALLEL=4
>>
>> COMPRESSION=ALL
>>
>> FLASHBACK_TIME=SYSTIMESTAMP
>>
>> EXCLUDE=STATISTICS
>>
>>
>>
>> It looks like the export does some work (lots of direct path reads) for a
>> while and then does nothing with tons of waits similar to:
>>
>>
>>
>> *** 2014-02-14 14:51:25.924
>>
>> WAIT #139990593434552: nam='wait for unread message on broadcast channel'
>> ela= 1000810 channel context=93982405280 channel handle=94519841120 p3=0
>> obj#=803670 tim=1392411085924778
>>
>>
>>
>> *** 2014-02-14 14:51:26.925
>>
>> WAIT #139990593434552: nam='wait for unread message on broadcast channel'
>> ela= 1000867 channel context=93982405280 channel handle=94519841120 p3=0
>> obj#=803670 tim=1392411086925789
>>
>> EXEC
>> #139990593434552:c=2999,e=5009559,p=0,cr=4,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=3,og=4,plh=0,tim=1392411086926186
>>
>> ERROR #139990593434552:err=25228 tim=1392411086926229
>>
>> CLOSE #139990593434552:c=0,e=4,dep=3,type=3,tim=1392411086926370
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm guessing that error possibly indicates a bug?
>>
>>
>>
>> The export is estimated to be ~80GB. I let it run for several hours this
>> morning and it was nowhere close to being done.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anybody have any ideas or seen this before?
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
>> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
>> it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
>> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
>> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
>> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email reply.
>>
>>
>>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Feb 17 2014 - 01:21:41 CET

Original text of this message