RE: SQL has me confused.

From: Powell, Mark <mark.powell2_at_hp.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:53:18 +0000
Message-ID: <1E24812FBE5611419EFAFC488D7CCDD118786EBD_at_G6W2491.americas.hpqcorp.net>

I dislike how everyone labels/calls the ANSI-92 new join syntax ANSI-joins which implies traditional join syntax is not ANSI compliant when it is. I find it easier and quicker to write and to later re-write queries using the traditional syntax. I only like the ANSI-92 syntax for coding outer joins. Perhaps by the end of the next decade I will get used to the ANSI-92 standard.

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Fergal Taheny Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:09 PM To: landstander668_at_gmail.com
Cc: oracle-l-freelists
Subject: Re: SQL has me confused.

Plus one for ANSI sql clarity. Used to think it was only for the dark side but I been converted.

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Wed Oct 16 2013 - 19:53:18 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Adric Norris: "tracking down hidden SQL???"
Previous message: Fergal Taheny: "Re: SQL has me confused."
In reply to: Fergal Taheny: "Re: SQL has me confused."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message