Re: question on required rpm for rhel5 for 11.2

From: Guillermo Alan Bort <cicciuxdba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:33:07 -0300
Message-ID: <CAJ2dSGS2ezB-Q3tW5PCFNSjUMPANK=H0OQoDnriq0zxSipqD7A_at_mail.gmail.com>

Have you tried installing oracle in a system without it? if linking goes all right then it shouldn't be a problem.

hth

Alan.-

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Maureen English <maureen.english_at_alaska.edu
> wrote:

> In the past, our SAs have typically installed a lot of 32-bit versions of
> Oracle rpms on a 64-bit machine. One of these is elfutils-libelf.i386.
> Our procedures have changed and our SAs will now not install the 32-bit
> version unless it is required.
>
> The 32-bit version of this library isn't listed as a requirement in the
> Oracle installation documentation. However, there are a number of other
> websites where people have posted instructions for installing the Oracle
> software and they include this rpm as a requirement.
>
> Anyone know why the 32-bit version would be listed as a requirement on
> these
> other (typically reliable) sites, but not as a requirement by Oracle?
>
> Do others typically install the 32-bit version of this library?
>
> - Maureen
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Fri Jul 19 2013 - 19:33:07 CEST