Re: i know cary millsap is super smart but...
From: Adam Musch <ahmusch_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:37:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH4Zrrut6QJCMeROOzaZTt=SoC12Ro=8dovVO1dqSkUdToQg-A_at_mail.gmail.com>
I would think so, from a certain point of view. Each core is reported to the OS as a CPU, and that's what you should use at it pertains to the rule of 2. So if you have two cpus each with four course, your rule of 2 number would be 8.
The underlying mathematics of queuing theory still remain the same.
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:37:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH4Zrrut6QJCMeROOzaZTt=SoC12Ro=8dovVO1dqSkUdToQg-A_at_mail.gmail.com>
I would think so, from a certain point of view. Each core is reported to the OS as a CPU, and that's what you should use at it pertains to the rule of 2. So if you have two cpus each with four course, your rule of 2 number would be 8.
The underlying mathematics of queuing theory still remain the same.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Josh Collier <Josh.Collier_at_banfield.net>wrote:
> This paper is 13 years old, is it still valid in the era of quad core
> processors?
> Batch Queue Management and the Magic of '2'
> Cary Millsap/Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
-- Adam Musch ahmusch_at_gmail.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Jun 14 2013 - 21:37:18 CEST