Re: Stupidity or sequences?
From: Thomas Kellerer <thomas.kellerer_at_mgm-tp.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:07:06 +0200
Message-ID: <516BA71A.5050309_at_mgm-tp.com>
Johan Eriksson, 12.04.2013 17:24:
> I think most of us has seen someone trying to be smart or trying to gain
> database independencies by not using oracle sequence
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:07:06 +0200
Message-ID: <516BA71A.5050309_at_mgm-tp.com>
Johan Eriksson, 12.04.2013 17:24:
> I think most of us has seen someone trying to be smart or trying to gain
> database independencies by not using oracle sequence
Almost all DBMS support sequences nowadays. Hiding the specific syntax of each DBMS to obtain the next sequence value isn't really hard.
Avoiding them means to settle on the limitations of one or two (limited) DBMS.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Apr 15 2013 - 09:07:06 CEST