Re: Unwanted SQL Developer inverse connection storming

From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:29:38 -0600
Message-ID: <516441F2.9020806_at_gmail.com>

Yup.

Can. And now, apparently almost *must*.

It's just a procedure. I'll need to discuss with my clients.

It's the *awareness* aspect that is important. Before, I could be sloppy, could have pleaded ignorance, and probably would have gotten away with it.

/Hans

On 09/04/2013 10:04 AM, Christopher.Taylor2_at_parallon.net wrote:
> SQL Developer is a standalone app right? (I know it used to be)
>
> So couldn't you have client folders with specific SQLDeveloper installations to prevent cross contamination?
>
> Chris

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Apr 09 2013 - 18:29:38 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Schmitt: "RE: Any concerns with the advisor privilege?"
Previous message: Peter Gram Miracle A/S: "Re: Any concerns with the advisor privilege?"
In reply to: Christopher.Taylor2_at_parallon.net: "RE: Unwanted SQL Developer inverse connection storming"
Next in thread: breitliw_at_centrexcc.com: "Re: Unwanted SQL Developer inverse connection storming"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message