Re: Deadlock inserting into same rowid (different block)

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:08:50 -0000
Message-ID: <B9183E8526B4440A99DC760EBD3BC22C_at_Primary>


The deadlock pattern is indicative of collisions on a unique constraint. They're both trying to insert primary / unique key values already inserted but not yet committed by the other session.

Given that the slot numbers are both zero, it's likely that they're being reported incorrectly - Oracle doesn't clean out the wait information for every single wait, so these could be the file and block (with zero row) for early buffer busy waits, or read by other session or some such.

Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/all-postings

Author: Oracle Core (Apress 2011)
http://www.apress.com/9781430239543

  • Original Message ----- From: "Patterson, Joel" <jpatterson_at_entint.com>

|
| Deadlock graph:
| ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
| Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds
waits
| TX-001a0015-00014787 34 90 X 32 3
S
| TX-00190008-0000601b 32 3 X 34 90
S
|
| session 90: DID 0001-0022-00000327 session 3: DID 0001-0020-000009E9
| session 3: DID 0001-0020-000009E9 session 90: DID
0001-0022-00000327
|
| Rows waited on:
| Session 90: obj - rowid = 00030CE5 - AAAwzlAAGAABDiuAAA
| (dictionary objn - 199909, file - 6, block - 276654, slot - 0)
| Session 3: obj - rowid = 00030CE5 - AAAwzlAAGAABp8gAAA
| (dictionary objn - 199909, file - 6, block - 433952, slot - 0)
|
|
|

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Mar 20 2013 - 16:08:50 CET

Original text of this message