RE: 12c on HPUX (Was: Oracle DBAs Needed in Kansas)

From: Dustin Hayden <DHayden_at_sprich.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:25:27 +0000
Message-ID: <ED8913458C966249856499C923CE5C8BE0479C58_at_prd-dag-01.ad.sprich.com>



Their tech support is very poor now as well. Especially with the overseas support. Twice I have had one of them refuse to escalate a SR.

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Leonard Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 7:45 PM To: hurleyjohnb_at_yahoo.com
Cc: tim_at_oracle-base.com; tim_at_evdbt.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: 12c on HPUX (Was: Oracle DBAs Needed in Kansas)

As somebody who is planning a 3rd one-off patch implementation, this month alone, to address availability issues, I can say that I'm not seeing that QA has improved on Solaris.

On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, John Hurley wrote:

> My unfortunate opinion ... Oracle QA is not what it used to be on most
> every platform including linux also.
>
>
> Maybe it is getting better now on solaris ... dunno ... but maybe.
>
> Things started getting pretty shaky coming out from oracle for hpux
> back in the
> 9.2 days ...
>
> Guess I am getting old and grumpy but dang hpux and solaris both used
> to be pretty well shaken out. They would even install cleanly!
>
> C'est la vie ...
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Feb 21 2013 - 13:25:27 CET

Original text of this message