Re: fdisk versus parted
From: Radoulov, Dimitre <cichomitiko_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:53:24 +0100
Message-ID: <5113BFE4.4070307_at_gmail.com>
On 07/02/2013 15:32, Walker, Jed S wrote:
> Here is what fdisk shows on the partitions. ORADATA01 was fdisk, ORADATA02 was parted. Note the "End" sector.
[...]
> Disk /dev/mapper/ORADATA01: 107.4 GB, 107374510080 bytes
> [...]
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/mapper/ORADATA01p1 2048 209715839 104856896 83 Linux
>
> [...]
>
> Disk /dev/mapper/ORADATA02: 107.4 GB, 107374510080 bytes
> [...]
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/mapper/ORADATA02p1 2048 209713151 104855552 83 Linux
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:53:24 +0100
Message-ID: <5113BFE4.4070307_at_gmail.com>
On 07/02/2013 15:32, Walker, Jed S wrote:
> Here is what fdisk shows on the partitions. ORADATA01 was fdisk, ORADATA02 was parted. Note the "End" sector.
[...]
> Disk /dev/mapper/ORADATA01: 107.4 GB, 107374510080 bytes
> [...]
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/mapper/ORADATA01p1 2048 209715839 104856896 83 Linux
>
> [...]
>
> Disk /dev/mapper/ORADATA02: 107.4 GB, 107374510080 bytes
> [...]
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/mapper/ORADATA02p1 2048 209713151 104855552 83 Linux
With 1MB (2048 cylinders, 512 bytes each = 1 MB) offset for the first
sector both seem fine to me
(the partitions are aligned for stripe size up to 1MB).
I'm not sure if end sector matters ...
Regards
Dimitre
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Feb 07 2013 - 15:53:24 CET