Re: oracle timestamp internal storage and precision
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:15:08 -0700
Message-ID: <50D2204C.6080208_at_gmail.com>
No, it does not.
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:15:08 -0700
Message-ID: <50D2204C.6080208_at_gmail.com>
No, it does not.
It can not.
On 19/12/2012 9:45 AM, Walker, Jed S wrote:
> Thanks Jared. I'm still curious if anyone knows the answer to my question?
> Does Oracle's internal format sacrifice precision over time to avoid running out of dates?
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Dec 19 2012 - 21:15:08 CET