Re: RE: Partitioning

From: Kellyn Pot'vin <>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <>

Zabair is making sure he explains himself clearer.. :)

Kellyn Pot'Vin
Senior Technical Consultant
RMOUG Director of Training Days 2013

~Tombez sept fois, se relever huit!

 From: Mark W. Farnham <> To:;; Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:34 PM Subject: RE: RE: Partitioning  

Zabair, are you sitting on your send button?

Holy cow.

-----Original Message-----

From: [] On Behalf Of Zabair Ahmed
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 2:27 PM To:; Subject: Re: RE: Partitioning

I don't think I explained myself very clearly David. What I hoped for was say that we have created the new partitioned table (PART TEST2) with the subpartition template values of USABLE and UNUSABLE for status-name. Everything is working fine but now the requirement has changed and status-name will have an additional value of say NONUSABLE. How could this be handled.

Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android



-- Received on Thu Nov 29 2012 - 20:40:45 CET

Original text of this message