Re: RE: Partitioning

From: Kellyn Pot'vin <kellyn.potvin_at_ymail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1354218045.91522.YahooMailNeo_at_web162001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>



Mark,
Zabair is making sure he explains himself clearer.. :)

 
Kellyn Pot'Vin
Senior Technical Consultant
Enkitec
DBAKevlar.com
RMOUG Director of Training Days 2013

~Tombez sept fois, se relever huit!



 From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com> To: roon987_at_yahoo.co.uk; oracle-l_at_freelists.org; oratune_at_yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:34 PM Subject: RE: RE: Partitioning  

Zabair, are you sitting on your send button?

Holy cow.

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Zabair Ahmed
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 2:27 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org; oratune_at_yahoo.com Subject: Re: RE: Partitioning

I don't think I explained myself very clearly David. What I hoped for was say that we have created the new partitioned table (PART TEST2) with the subpartition template values of USABLE and UNUSABLE for status-name. Everything is working fine but now the requirement has changed and status-name will have an additional value of say NONUSABLE. How could this be handled.

Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Thu Nov 29 2012 - 20:40:45 CET

Original text of this message