Re: RE: Partitioning
From: David Fitzjarrell <oratune_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1354210155.38864.YahooMailNeo_at_web121601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Have you not read the last response I sent? Please look at it again as it modifies the existing table to add subpartitions.
From: Zabair Ahmed <roon987_at_yahoo.co.uk> To: "oracle-l_at_freelists.org" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>; "oratune_at_yahoo.com" <oratune_at_yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 9:49 AM Subject: Re: RE: Partitioning
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1354210155.38864.YahooMailNeo_at_web121601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Have you not read the last response I sent? Please look at it again as it modifies the existing table to add subpartitions.
David Fitzjarrell
From: Zabair Ahmed <roon987_at_yahoo.co.uk> To: "oracle-l_at_freelists.org" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>; "oratune_at_yahoo.com" <oratune_at_yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 9:49 AM Subject: Re: RE: Partitioning
I don't think I explained myself very clearly David. What I hoped for was say that we have created the new partitioned table (PART TEST2) with the subpartition template values of USABLE and UNUSABLE for status-name. Everything is working fine but now the requirement has changed and status-name will have an additional value of say NONUSABLE.
How could this be handled.
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Nov 29 2012 - 18:29:15 CET