Re: Transportable Tablespaces and Deferred segment creation "bug"
From: Norman Dunbar <oracle_at_dunbar-it.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:57:29 +0000
Message-ID: <50B39169.50702_at_dunbar-it.co.uk>
Hi Niall,
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:57:29 +0000
Message-ID: <50B39169.50702_at_dunbar-it.co.uk>
Hi Niall,
On 26/11/12 15:49, Niall Litchfield wrote:
> I don't buy the space saving thing (there might be dictionary performance
> improvements of course).
Well, it's how Oracle sell the feature - large databases with lots of
empty tables etc ...
It's not a space saving problem for me, it's just a PITA!
> ... It strikes me that people
> who worry about a wasted few hundred mb in a schema that size are probably
> either overly obsessive, unbelievably effective or just looking in the
> wrong place for space savings. :)
Or, just following ordered from on high? :-(
Cheers,
Norm.
-- Norman Dunbar Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd Registered address: Thorpe House 61 Richardshaw Lane Pudsey West Yorkshire United Kingdom LS28 7EL Company Number: 05132767 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Nov 26 2012 - 16:57:29 CET