Re: DB CPU is much lower than CPU Time Reported by TOP SQL consumers

From: Ls Cheng <exriscer_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:20:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ2-Qb9ujodNeQY7RvFUcg2eYEodjfNncrJj=3bTNJ70hhLFZw_at_mail.gmail.com>

Hi
I have 16 CPU so figure, 57600 seconds per hour CPU power.

But I am not looking weather I am CPU or IO bounded. I wonder why sql cpu time is much larger than db cpu reported

TIA
--

LSC
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Tue Nov 13 2012 - 14:20:30 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tom Dale: "Re: Oracle user process uses all memory and swap on server"
Previous message: mohamed houri: "Re: DB CPU is much lower than CPU Time Reported by TOP SQL consumers"
In reply to: mohamed houri: "Re: DB CPU is much lower than CPU Time Reported by TOP SQL consumers"
Next in thread: Petr Novak: "AW: DB CPU is much lower than CPU Time Reported by TOP SQL consumers"
Reply: Petr Novak: "AW: DB CPU is much lower than CPU Time Reported by TOP SQL consumers"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message