RE: SQL question

From: Ramadoss, Karthik <Karthik.Ramadoss_at_accidentfund.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:46:46 +0000
Message-ID: <92583F1E24E0E94485E321E139D18321B42D2779_at_Stromboli.accidentfund.com>



Hans,

Yes, the IDs are enforced primary keys on all tables in the same database.

Sorry that database is now being refreshed and I am waiting to see if I can reproduce this behavior again. The same queries on the source database (which is of the same version as the buggy database) works as expected.

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Hans Forbrich Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 6:44 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: SQL question

Exactly my point.
In theory it should not, if ID is an enforced primary key. But ...

One additional question, based on further posts, is: are these queries on the same DB?

/Hans

On 24/10/2012 2:13 PM, Rumpi Gravenstein wrote:
> <snip>
> Theoretically table3 should not be required in the join </snip>
>
> Table 3 may be acting as a filter in which case it will impact the
> final count.
>
> Rumpi Gravenstein
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Oct 25 2012 - 14:46:46 CEST

Original text of this message