Re: Sizing ASM memory
From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:18:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CABe10sbG1jNCUP3DdaCZbLZ1vZb-7V=cLXoUAMG0Uqvaox5hhg_at_mail.gmail.com>
Hi Raj
I don't find that a great formula since it boils down to 256 (mb) plus integer plus 132 (kb). Which for all reasonable CPU cores per server is less than 272mb unless there's a missing unit per process. Any time I see two different units added together in a 'formula' my hackles rise.... On Oct 8, 2012 7:10 PM, "rjamya" <rjamya_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:18:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CABe10sbG1jNCUP3DdaCZbLZ1vZb-7V=cLXoUAMG0Uqvaox5hhg_at_mail.gmail.com>
Hi Raj
I don't find that a great formula since it boils down to 256 (mb) plus integer plus 132 (kb). Which for all reasonable CPU cores per server is less than 272mb unless there's a missing unit per process. Any time I see two different units added together in a 'formula' my hackles rise.... On Oct 8, 2012 7:10 PM, "rjamya" <rjamya_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> There is technical note 437924.1 as well, towards the end there is a
> sizing formula as well for 11203.
>
> Raj
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Oct 08 2012 - 21:18:16 CEST