Re: ASM of any significant value when switching to Direct NFS / NetApp / non-RAC?
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:33:56 +0100
Message-id: <F7E4CEB1-F003-4DDD-954E-A0EBDE600DA2_at_me.com>
Thanks for the tip Matt. There has been some discussion on the possibility of having a script that runs periodically and does a tcpdump. Sounds like this is the way to go - subject to testing in non- prod env of course!
On 16 Aug 2012, at 03:04, Matthew Zito wrote:
> You could do this with tcpdump/snoop/whatever packet sniffing
> technology you want, and then load it into wireshark. That should be
> sufficient to see the latency times packet-wise.
>
> Not as clean or elegant as a v$ table or iostat, but you can get the
> data.
>
> Matt
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Austin Hackett <hacketta_57_at_me.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi Dana
>> This info doesn't exactly relate to ASM, but I hopefully it'll be of
>> use to you in the future...
>>
>> I've recently started a new role at shop that uses Linux, Direct NFS
>> and NetApp (no ASM) and as others have suggested, the solution does
>> have a number of nice management features.
>>
>> However, I am finding the apparent lack of read and write latency
>> stats frustrating.
>>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sun Aug 19 2012 - 04:33:56 CDT