RE: Interpreting USED_UREC from V$TRANSACTION
From: Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen_at_OneNeck.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 17:54:46 +0000
Message-ID: <A250F0C68C23514CA9F3DF63D60EE10E163DE682_at_onews31>
I don't know the answer, but I'm curious if you see the same behavior with used_ublk? I've always used used_ublk instead of used_urec for tracking rollback progress, but I'm not really sure if one is more reliable than the other. I found a mention of negative values from Tom Kyte here, but it's not very helpful for your situation:
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 17:54:46 +0000
Message-ID: <A250F0C68C23514CA9F3DF63D60EE10E163DE682_at_onews31>
I don't know the answer, but I'm curious if you see the same behavior with used_ublk? I've always used used_ublk instead of used_urec for tracking rollback progress, but I'm not really sure if one is more reliable than the other. I found a mention of negative values from Tom Kyte here, but it's not very helpful for your situation:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:7143624535091#7144052065612
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Jul 06 2012 - 12:54:46 CDT