RE: Sequence Skipping

From: Lange, Kevin G <kevin.lange_at_ppoone.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:49:14 -0500
Message-ID: <F077F09A0E11504D9E720358BEE994D10A7F32D1_at_APSW0553EVS.ms.ds.uhc.com>



Thank you . Did not know that. Appreciate the info.

From: oracle_at_dunbar-it.co.uk [mailto:oracle_at_dunbar-it.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 4:47 PM
To: Lange, Kevin G; tim_at_evdbt.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Sequence Skipping

Evening Kevin.

If you cache your sequences, and wish to reduce lost numbers, simply pin the sequence.

Other than crashes and shutdown aborts, cached values will no longer be lost. I've been doing that since Oracle 8 as far as I remember.

Cheers,
Norm.

Sent from my HTC

  • Reply message ----- From: "Lange, Kevin G" <kevin.lange_at_ppoone.com> To: <tim_at_evdbt.com>, <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Subject: Sequence Skipping Date: Wed, Jun 13, 2012 21:54

I was only saying that , there is a likely chance that , at some point, you will lose some values from your sequence if you have caching turned on. So, if your application is designed in such a way as to have a limited range for the sequence, then the use of cacheing could cause the sequence to hit the upper boundry prematurely. Not saying its the best design for the sequence to have an upper value like that, but sometimes you have no choice.

I only mention this because I have seen it happen under just those circumstances.


From: Tim Gorman [mailto:tim_at_evdbt.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:38 PM
To: Lange, Kevin G; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Sequence Skipping

I don't understand the implied relationship between the sequence value returned and caching. Could you explain?

And why would it be useful to use NOCACHE (except for diagnostics), even for infrequently-used sequences? What would be the advantage?

-----Original Message-----
From: Lange, Kevin G [mailto:kevin.lange_at_ppoone.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 02:31 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Sequence Skipping

If the sequence is used to set the key in lookup tables that have a max size on said field, then nocache would be appropriate. Otherwise, dropping x amount of sequence values could blow out the max that is set prematurely. Basically, any infrequantly used system generated key field is a candidate for nocache. Of course, that's only my opinion. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Tim Gorman Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:26 PM To: Scott.Graves_at_nisc.coop; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Sequence Skipping There is absolutely no evidence that the sequence is being "flushed from the SGA", but rather more likely that the WHEN NOT MATCHED condition of the MERGE statement (i.e. when the sequence NEXTVAL is referenced) is possibly being accessed unnecessarly during the WHEN MATCHED condition. Setting NOCACHE on a heavily-accessed sequence as a perceived "solution" is the classic situation of the "cure" causing more pain than the "problem". However, *temporarily* setting the sequence to NOCACHE might be a useful diagnostic technique, as a SQL trace of the MERGE statement would then clearly indicate whether the sequence is being accessed inappropriately during WHEN MATCHED, as the recursive UPDATE SEQ$ statement should be visible and countable. But setting a sequence to NOCACHE is almost always due to a typo during CREATE/ALTER SEQUENCE or a misunderstanding of when to use/when not to use sequences. The only appropriate use of NOCACHE is diagnostic, such as described just above. I'd be curious to know if anyone has any other valid use of NOCACHE or even under-caching a sequence? -----Original Message----- From: Scott Graves [mailto:Scott.Graves_at_nisc.coop] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 01:51 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: RE: Sequence Skipping When the sequence is flushed from the SGA, the unused numbers in the cache are burnt. Set your sequences to nocache and that behavior goes away.-----Original Message-----From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth NaimSent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:32 PMTo: oracle-l_at_freelists.orgSubject: Sequence SkippingI use the following two merge statements to load data into a dimension table nightly. Every night the process runs the sequence (seq_procedure_key) gets incremented by approximetly 57,000 values even though only 4-37 rows are added. There are about 57,000 in the procedures table, Millions in the medical_bill_detail tables and 17k in the cpt table. It seems one of the two merge statements is wasting 1 sequence value for every row that does not get inserted. I've tried searching metalink for bugs and so far have come up empty. I am experiencing this in 10.2.0.3 prod environment and an 11.2.0.3 test environment. If this is ex pected behavior, any known workarounds. I don't mind losing some values but 57k per day is too many. The load failed as the column related to the sequence was defined as number(8) and the sequence was into the 9th digit. BTW the cache on the sequence is 50.merge into procedures a using (select nvl(replace(cpt_code,' '),'None') cpt_code, cpt_descr from cpt where cpt_code is not null) b on
(a.cpt_code=b.cpt_code) when matched then update set
a.procedure_name=b.cpt_descr where
nvl(procedure_name,'~')<>nvl(b.cpt_descr,'~') and cpt_descr is not null when not matched then insert (procedure_key, cpt_code, procedure_name)

values (seq_procedure_key.nextval, b.cpt_code, b.cpt_descr);
v_number_of_records:=sql%rowcount; pkg_etl.p_end_process(v_process_id,
v_number_of_records, null, false); v_process_type_id: 9;
pkg_etl.p_start_process(v_process_type_id, load_id_in, null, null, null, v_process_id); merge into procedures a using (select distinct replace(cpt_code,' ') cpt_code, null cpt_de scr from wcis_dba.medical_bill_detail where cpt_code is not null) b on
(a.cpt_code=b.cpt_code) when not matched then insert (procedure_key,
cpt_code, procedure_name) values (seq_procedure_key.nextval, b.cpt_code, b.cpt_descr);Thanks,Ken -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l




This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Jun 13 2012 - 16:49:14 CDT

Original text of this message