RE: 11gr2 v$access oddity?
From: Powell, Mark <mark.powell2_at_hp.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:05:18 +0100
Message-ID: <7C4BF3B32B80CC44AE37D31B172415937DDE889E28_at_GVW1337EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Wouldn't that indicate that Oracle Workspace Manager (9i+) is in use?
TYPE
95 DWDEVTEAM F_GL_MONTHLY_BALANCE TABLE 95 DWDEVTEAM F_GL_MONTHLY_BALANCE MULTI-VERSI ONED OBJECT F_GL_MONTHLY_BALANCE is a partitioned table.
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:05:18 +0100
Message-ID: <7C4BF3B32B80CC44AE37D31B172415937DDE889E28_at_GVW1337EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Wouldn't that indicate that Oracle Workspace Manager (9i+) is in use?
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of dbvision_at_iinet.net.au
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 6:55 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: 11gr2 v$access oddity?
This from a query on v$access in our DW in 11.2.0.3.2:
SID OWNER OBJECT
-------------- --------------------
TYPE
95 DWDEVTEAM F_GL_MONTHLY_BALANCE TABLE 95 DWDEVTEAM F_GL_MONTHLY_BALANCE MULTI-VERSI ONED OBJECT F_GL_MONTHLY_BALANCE is a partitioned table.
"Multi-versioned object"?????
Looked it up everywhere, doesn't seem to register in google.
Anyone seen this before? What exactly is a "multi-versioned object"?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri May 18 2012 - 08:05:18 CDT