Re: Oracle Says Customers Should Draw Their Own Conclusions on Itanium

From: Mindaugas Navickas <mnavickas_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 06:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1337261329.81572.YahooMailNeo_at_web110014.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

And to "help" customers to make their mind, Oracle is charging much higher maintainance cost if clients decide to stay on HP Itanium... with obvious suggestion to migrate to Exadata... I do not think that any technical arguments have any power in this discution...  
Mike Navickas
Oracle&DB2 DBA
From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com> To: kamusis_at_gmail.com
Cc: greg_at_structureddata.org; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:51:28 AM
Subject: Re: Oracle Says Customers Should Draw Their Own Conclusions on Itanium

Disclosure to the court puts them in the public domain. I'm interested to know whether the court also maintains a complete list of disclosed docs from both sides (rather than edited highlights). From where I'm standing Oracle's list is worse than trying to judge a trial based on newspaper reports because of the obvious bias.
hmm - I didn't intend to describe Oracle as worse than News International but...

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Leyi Kamus Zhang <kamusis_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Is this legal? publish the highly confidential internal mails to the
> public?
>
> --
> Kamus <kamusis_at_gmail.com>
>
> Visit my blog for more : http://www.dbform.com
> Join ACOUG: http://www.acoug.org
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu May 17 2012 - 08:28:49 CDT