Re: Oracle Says Customers Should Draw Their Own Conclusions on Itanium

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:51:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CABe10sY5WY4jdFN4G+mdth0TUqowa0tmAM1ojBMb2ob7T70pLA_at_mail.gmail.com>

Disclosure to the court puts them in the public domain. I'm interested to know whether the court also maintains a complete list of disclosed docs from both sides (rather than edited highlights). From where I'm standing Oracle's list is worse than trying to judge a trial based on newspaper reports because of the obvious bias.
hmm - I didn't intend to describe Oracle as worse than News International but...

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Leyi Kamus Zhang <kamusis_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Is this legal? publish the highly confidential internal mails to the
> public?
>
> --
> Kamus <kamusis_at_gmail.com>
>
> Visit my blog for more : http://www.dbform.com
> Join ACOUG: http://www.acoug.org
>
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Greg Rahn <greg_at_structureddata.org>
> wrote:
> > I'm not taking sides, but probably worth a read.
> > http://www.oracle.com/itanium
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Greg Rahn | blog <http://bit.ly/u9N0i8> | twitter <
> http://bit.ly/v733dJ> |
> > linkedin <http://linkd.in/gregrahn>
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu May 17 2012 - 04:51:28 CDT