Re: OMS and Repository Preferences
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:08:02 -0600
Message-ID: <4F8887A2.5090500_at_gmail.com>
Thanks for the rewording. I now catch your meaning. I've decided that their license conditionals "a separate database may be used for the RMAN repository" + "a separate database may be used for the OMR" should be two separate databases [as long as all targets are properly licensed] , which makes them each properly licensed, and then you should be able to use DG Logical to provide protections. ;-) (Sophistry, I say! Sophistry!! A delight to nimble minds and lawyers alike.)
Needless to say, the entire discussion of standby DB and this variant will likely always require Oracle sales and legal to interpret, and thus will almost always be determined entirely by delta-to-quota.
/Hans
On 13/04/2012 1:46 PM, Tim Hall wrote:
> OK. To revise my statement...
>
> It is my understanding that DG is only allowed as an option on a fully
> licensed EE database. If you want the OMR protected using DG you have
> to pay full whack for the EE licenses.
>
> I would be very happy to be proved wrong. :)
>
> Of course, as with any Oracle licensing issue, the only way to be sure
> it to get about 16 independent quotes and compare them, factoring in
> the over-licensing suggested by the sales people in an attempt to get
> the new Porsche a bit quicker. :)
>
> Cheers
>
> Tim...
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Apr 13 2012 - 15:08:02 CDT