Re: OMS and Repository Preferences

From: Tim Hall <>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:09:58 +0100
Message-ID: <>


Take a look at this:

From your description it sounds like you are only planning a level 1 setup (1 repository instance and 1 OMS instance). If that is the case, I see very little benefit to having it on 2 machines, as opposed to 1. If either DB or OMS machine dies it's all gone anyway. Since the two servers in this setup provide no additional resilience, I would prefer a simpler solution of a single server myself.

Of course, if the plan is to move to a more resilient solution in the future, it may alter my opinion somewhat.



On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Kellyn Pot'vin <> wrote:
> I know it's common for many folks to separate their OMS from their repository for Enterprise Manager-  I haven't been one to do this in the past due to, OK, just going to say it, flaky network connectivity in previous environments that would cause *false* communication alerts with the OMS components to/from the repository.  I now have new clients, new systems to work on and at least two EM12c environments to build out in the near future.
> So here's my question:
> What is your preference when building an Enterprise Manager environment?  Do you house the OMS and the repository on the same host or separately and I want to know WHY you build it one way or the other, not just "It just should be that way.. " :)
> Thanks!
> Kellyn Pot'Vin
> Senior Technical Consultant
> Enkitec
> --

Received on Thu Apr 12 2012 - 10:09:58 CDT

Original text of this message