RE: infoworld call
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:17:02 -0600
Message-ID: <C5533BD628A9524496D63801704AE56D6ADCE0C7D4_at_SPOBMEXC14.adprod.directory>
Right. Any user that has create session privilege can have a db link created to it, right?
Chris Taylor
Sr. Oracle DBA
Ingram Barge Company
Nashville, TN 37205
"Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of intelligent effort." -- John Ruskin (English Writer 1819-1900)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete the contents of this message without disclosing the contents to anyone, using them for any purpose, or storing or copying the information on any medium.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Forbrich [mailto:fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 11:36 AM
To: Taylor, Chris David
Cc: 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
Subject: Re: infoworld call
If I read that correctly, this is assuming DB Links.
/Hans
On 20/01/2012 9:46 AM, Taylor, Chris David wrote:
> If Marcin's test case is valid about a desktop XE instance being able to drive up the SCN of any other instance it connects to, then it stands to reason that this has the *potential* to affect EVERY Oracle database customer that allows users to create sessions and install software on their workstations.
>
> Right?
>
> Chris Taylor
> Sr. Oracle DBA
> Ingram Barge Company
> Nashville, TN 37205
>
> "Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of intelligent effort."
> -- John Ruskin (English Writer 1819-1900)
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete the contents of this message without disclosing the contents to anyone, using them for any purpose, or storing or copying the information on any medium.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Hans Forbrich
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:40 AM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Re: infoworld call
>
> I'm guessing this will be on the list of improvements for 12c.
>
> It's about time that version gets 'aired' ... based on histerical cycles, we should be starting to hear rumblings about (DB) 12c within the next few weeks anyway.
>
> UNtil then, Iwonder how many customers this really impacts.
>
> /Hans
>
> On 20/01/2012 8:46 AM, Allen, Brandon wrote:
>> They do indicate that this is in the plans at the bottom of MOS
>> 1376995.1
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
>> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of De DBA
>>
>> <snip>
>> I would like to think that the hard limit in future versions will be put at a bit higher than a 48-bit integer...
>> <snip>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
>> --
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>
>>
>>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Jan 20 2012 - 12:17:02 CST