Re: infoworld call

From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:39:47 -0700
Message-ID: <4F1998D3.5060808_at_gmail.com>

I'm guessing this will be on the list of improvements for 12c.

It's about time that version gets 'aired' ... based on histerical cycles, we should be starting to hear rumblings about (DB) 12c within the next few weeks anyway.

UNtil then, Iwonder how many customers this really impacts.

/Hans

On 20/01/2012 8:46 AM, Allen, Brandon wrote:
> They do indicate that this is in the plans at the bottom of MOS 1376995.1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of De DBA
>
> <snip>
> I would like to think that the hard limit in future versions will be put at a bit higher than a 48-bit integer...
> <snip>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Fri Jan 20 2012 - 10:39:47 CST