Re: infoworld call
From: Marcin Przepiorowski <pioro1_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:15:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGdek=xOd=jqZ=+BykxGHoKeg7tK1_bg_mobp1Q4vSu_532BSQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Rich Jesse <rjoralist2_at_society.servebeer.com> wrote:
> Ray writes:
>
>> infoworld say this bug is really ugly.
>
> Well that certainly does sound potentially ugly. And it describes the
> reason behind the 16K/s transaction limitation that was discussed here a few
> years back.
>
> At least I have my SCN growth patterns for about a year now and we won't
> even hit 80B in the next 10 years. At current rates. Provided nothing else
> changes. Ever...
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:15:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGdek=xOd=jqZ=+BykxGHoKeg7tK1_bg_mobp1Q4vSu_532BSQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Rich Jesse <rjoralist2_at_society.servebeer.com> wrote:
> Ray writes:
>
>> infoworld say this bug is really ugly.
>
> Well that certainly does sound potentially ugly. And it describes the
> reason behind the 16K/s transaction limitation that was discussed here a few
> years back.
>
> At least I have my SCN growth patterns for about a year now and we won't
> even hit 80B in the next 10 years. At current rates. Provided nothing else
> changes. Ever...
I think it is ugly - I was able to prepare new XE database with quite huge SCN (MOS check from [ID 1393363.1] reported Result: C - SCN Headroom is low) and after that simple DB link allow me to propagate that SCN to other database using user account.
regards,
-- Marcin Przepiorowski http://oracleprof.blogspot.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Jan 18 2012 - 09:15:01 CST