Re: RE: enq: TM contention
From: Rajaram Subramanian <rajaram.subramanian_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:15:07 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <1324073707.66234.androidMobile_at_web29905.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
One other possibility which I have experienced is performing direct path insert on a table when there is already an existing uncommitted transaction on the same table and a direct path insert has been performed. In my case I was able to resolve it by explicitly inserting to the subpartition. Regards
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:15:07 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <1324073707.66234.androidMobile_at_web29905.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
One other possibility which I have experienced is performing direct path insert on a table when there is already an existing uncommitted transaction on the same table and a direct path insert has been performed. In my case I was able to resolve it by explicitly inserting to the subpartition. Regards
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Dec 16 2011 - 16:15:07 CST